Humping Crowded Train

True or false?

di Rossana Rossanda - da il Manifesto del 04-09-2007


Possono o non possono i ministri d'un governo di coalizione partecipare a una manifestazione che chiede di mutare in aula alcuni aspetti d'un pacchetto di norme sociali? Dei quali il meno che si può dire è che nel programma elettorale parevano promessi? Squisito caso costituzionale, che oscura il merito del contendere: exactly how it goes with pensions, because they have such huge bales on the budgets of INPS, as there are insecure, if you really would inevitably required by growth.
Even I feared. But why would result in an event with or without ministers? The demonstrations do not vote. The only threat that the government is Lamberto Dini, who said that if the classroom, that is, the more legitimate sites, change the package is not yet approved, they will vote against him and his government. Therefore addresses, the concern, Dr. Dini.
To return to the merits, there would be expensive if you answer the following questions and thesis:

1. It is true that we must cut pensions (through età, scalini o altre pensate) perché il bilancio pensionistico dell'Inps sarebbe in deficit. Il bilancio delle pensioni, cioè il saldo fra contributi pagati dai lavoratori e pensioni erogate è in attivo. Vero o falso?

2. Il bilancio dell'Inps è in rosso esclusivamente perché sono messe indebitamente a suo carico le spese per casse integrazioni lavoro e una serie di altre misure assistenziali. Esse dovrebbero cadere su regimi speciali con relativa legge, lasciando ai lavoratori il bilancio delle proprie pensioni. Vero o falso?

3. I pensionati non costano nulla alla fiscalità pubblica, mentre vi contribuiscono pagando le tasse anche sul reddito che da esse proviene. Vero o falso?

4. La gobba that would have inflated pension expenditure in accordance with the provisions of the Dini government, has not occurred. They were wrong. True or false?

5. What a civilized country has about six million pensioners (out of sixteen) to less than € 500 per month is a disgrace. Or not? I would like to reply signed.

6. Much more remains to be said about pensions. Meanwhile, Massimo D'Alema will cease to swear that there is money. For pensions do not need. The prohibition to use the treasure to the service is not a dogma of the Roman Catholic Church. Take care of Afghanistan (in foreign policy if it was not so far fared badly) instead of welfare which are not known. By the way, had not found a set of adult male and guaranteed. True or false?

7. Precarious. According to the calculation of the precarious Luciano Gallino are four to five million, about one in four workers. And do not stop growing. True or false?

8. It is convenient to business, particularly in the tertiary sector (those in larger manufacturing job insecurity already exists at large), where the worker is paid only on days you need reduces costs and increases profitability. True or false? When the work is classified, the disposable it should be short but the company wasted a lot of know how. True or false? When the status is low (such as call center) is the insecurity that most resembles the work of the last century fragmented, with basic rights in less. True or false?

9. Only young people who have a family or have a qualification behind strong market (ie short), prefer temporary work that hard. True or false?

10. Aiming at a salary of general citizenship, and a chat. It would amount, according to calculations made in France by Marc Augé, about half the subsistence minimum wage when he made the killing of the entire current structure of welfare. True or false? There are ten theses and questions. Only after you have replied to discuss extremism and ceiling, and so on. Do it yourself first means to hide the simple truth, and the next primary.

Age Of Empires Age Of Kings 2.0a No Cd

Antonio Carlo notes "labor crisis and decline of capitalism," Some critical notes

If the last I found it wholly convincing, the penultimate essay of Prof. Carlo Antonio ("Crisis in the work and setting of capitalism"), which appeared in your magazine, has caused me some concern. I agree with all the talk
unreliability of official methods of statistical measurement of unemployment (and beyond). I might add that in the U.S., these, with the wind, have suffered in recent decades, continuous updates, just to hide the reality, often relying on "scientific" system for telephone calls to the samples, under which those who worked in a given period, for example if only for a week, is among the working population ... I agree also all that is said about the spread of temporary work, etc..
I also agree that in the capitalist system in the long run, fewer workers are able to produce as many did in the past, such as agriculture docet.
fact remains, that this prospect (also supported by the German sociologist pluricitato Rifkin or group of Krisis, a Robert Kurz of all) does not explain, in my opinion, the current phenomenon adequately. E 'technology in the last quarter of the last century and until now has taken away work? This should have led to a series of productive investments which the capitalist world in general does not record for decades now, decades in which, however, when there was some momentary recovery, was determined by a greater exploitation of labor and old machinery. Elsewhere
Prof. Charles spoke about the lack of productive investment (accumulation), but here it does not and the whole argument seems to depend on unemployment, however, if I understand, from the assumption that the machines are to exclude workers from the world of work.
Rather than invest in production technology, facilities, etc., the tendency, in my opinion, now distant from the post-war boom was rather to relocate factories overseas, where labor is cheap, and / or channel flood of speculative capital into the sector. In the U.S. domestic de-industrialization of the last Forty years is a massive transfer of production abroad (first in Canada and then in Europe, Asia ...); not to mention just speculation and financial policy aimed at forcing foreign holders of dollars to invest in the U.S. market .
Post-Fordism, the microelectronics revolution, is another of the myths of our time that as the concept of globalization should be clarified and properly scaled. Only, while on the subject of globalization Prof. Charles has made clarifications effective, with regard to technological innovations seem to me that it emphasizes the role in the current phase of history. Sincerely, Alex Cocuzza

The Aging Female Genitalia

article by Charles Anthony "The economy" global "a sinking Titanic"

In place of class struggle takes over a journalistic formula: the "social question". Rather than a process of revolutionary transformation of society, believe that we can build a new society through state grants, how to build a new railway, it is presumed that the state as an independent reality, which has its own intellectual foundations free and moral, rather than treat this company as the basis of the existing state. The forms of the state are more or less free to the extent that they restrict the "freedom of the state." (K Marx, "Notes on the Program of German workers' party" (Gotha).


First Antonio Carlo in criticizing the current myths of journalism in the left and, using empirical data to refute the thesis that allow the fashion of the global economy "governed" by an Empire. The theories on planning introduced by certain ideologies of the 70 were transferred from the myth that the Empire State Plan-plan through its international bodies are the result of some intellectual fantasies of old-fashioned view of the condition of total anarchy in which they live capitalism in the modern era. By now the weather of the IMF or World Bank are reviewed at a later date at a premium. Interesting, but only hinted at, the transformation of classical dynamics relativa all’accumulazione di capitale in speculazione globale che porta inevitabilmente l’attuale sistema economico verso il baratro. Purtroppo Antonio Carlo non va a fondo nell’analizzare la dinamica speculativa. Infatti l’autore mette si in evidenza l’incremento inusitato dell’indebitamento USA specie di quello privato ma si limita a giustificarlo esclusivamente sul versante dei consumi mentre gran parte di tale indebitamento ( come dimostrato da vari studi empirici) sarebbe causato dal trasferimento di capitale all’interno della speculazione sui titoli, sui bond e specie sui derivati.
Interessante la messa in discussione del mito del boom economico cinese ed indiano “L’impero di Cindia ovvero il miracolo di cartapesta”. Purtroppo l’autore accetta i dati ufficiali del PIL (forse non conosce i numerosi interventi che contestano i criteri di rilevazione dei dati statistici come quelli di Thomas Rawski) ma nonostante questo riesce a dimostrare l’infondatezza del possibile sviluppo futuro da grandi potenze di economie ancora al palo se raffrontate alle dinamiche di sviluppo che hanno caratterizzato il capitalismo nei paesi avanzati (come l’Inghilterra studiata da Marx e dai classici). Poi analizzando la trasformazione del capitalismo in una sorta di organismo malato caratterizzato da dinamiche criminali legate alla corruzione non riesce ad evitare il solito intervento, tipico di coloro che vogliono dare delle ricette, in cui propone degli interventi immediati, Charles points out several times even though his soul roots. It is on these that I wish to say something. First, the basic income

"In the first issue (which it was derived from the article) I emphasized the centrality of the citizen's income, however, intended as an income that rewards work, cd job
This type of civic engagement objective is of overwhelming, because it contrasts with the thrust of the system that creates little employment (high unemployment) to bind it to profit, here we have a reverse approach (paid work and not linked to profits but to the social needs) that , however, comes from collective needs not adequately met from the system. "

Essentially Charles called citizen's income on the dole in this northern European economies, which is undergoing a constant over time due to scaling of the cut to the welfare state has become an inevitable law for any Government. In fact, the success achieved by the conservative parties in Northern Europe should not be surprised, even cutting the adjustment policies adopted by Labour in the UK and not just in this country. What makes it impossible for a reversal of this kind is the no longer in mass made by workers in advanced economies to push for a substantial reduction of the welfare state in favor of a wage recovery based on tax cuts. This behavior is dictated largely by the inability to recover through the old system of wage negotiations or through the recruitment of more jobs as in the years 80-90. The workers social status if they want to pay for themselves when needed.

How could a modern state able to "keep up a difficult balance between costs (high and always necessary) and cut" as stated above, the author adds a little later "Across the growing weight of debt public and private sectors can make the economy collapse, while the state is weakened and depleted appears increasingly unable to perform its functions tradizionali” Per cui oggettivamente incapace di invertire una tendenza verso i tagli. Non solo ma aggiunge lucidamente che i paesi sviluppati ormai ossessionati dal loro debito e dai servizi del debito non possono certo abbonare il debito dei paesi più poveri o cosiddetti emergenti “ come propone Bono degli U2, ma al “leader” della grande “rock band”, nessuno ha il coraggio di dire che se poi questo nobile atto di generosità fosse realizzato le più grandi unità del mondo economico occidentale farebbero un crack clamoroso. Più passa il tempo e più il debito cresce il che rende impensabile (in termini capitalistici) un suo annullamento, spingendo
sempre più i paesi emergenti verso la bancarotta. The system has created an unmanageable situation, the emerging dance on the edge but a fall would drag them too. "

How is it possible in a state of cul de sac of this type illusion that a government can afford to a "citizen's income? E 'less utopian to propose the Dictatorship of the Proletariat

" This raises a big knot, as that is possible, here and now fund this type of work, and the source in my opinion can only be the fight against tax evasion. On this land will be major opportunities for alliance between radicals and reformers, and there is the possibility to leverage on a wedge, a conflict that is emerging between capital and the bourgeois-national state. "

We dream the dreams, just before Charles stresses the link between criminal capitalism that now rages in all fields, and the political system through corruption and kickbacks that do not spare even the" reformist "government in which the author appeals to create a relentless fight against tax evasion. How can you achieve unity between reformists and radicals (which?)? And how could you outline the differences between radicals and reformists in government that achieves a total evasion battle? It might be a revolutionary government ... these days ... no?)
But it is not clear is the state that is left corrupt, but all are susceptible to corruption when the only way to achieve gains is determined by a dynamic construction that is now given only by speculation (in every sense). Even an association that aims to help some poor third world power game is obliged to bend to the needs of the first round of criminal activities in order to continue (and there are examples galore)
fact

"Even in USA, the history of IM smoking and fast food (certainly not strategic, but still IM) is indicative: the "class actions" proceedings brought against them by large organized groups of consumers, hanno portato a condanne risarcitorie clamorose dell’ordine di miliardi (di dollari), nel più grande paese del mondo (economicamente parlando), patria delle più grosse IM, gruppi consistenti di cittadini (spesso organizzati in movimento),ottengono sentenze clamorose ed umilianti e ciò significa una svolta epocale, significa che si è eroso il consenso sociale al mondo degli affari e del capitale, che comincia ad essere screditato; per trovare una crisi di consenso simile occorre tornare indietro negli anni ’30, gli anni della Grande depressione."

Ma l’autore, forse illuso da qualche storiella rappresentata in qualche film di successo, non si rende conto che ormai esiste un business tra gli avvocati related to lawsuits against U.S. corporations that are paying citizen groups, as organized in the lobby, small sums of money compared to their profits, their activities continues with impunity
And in Italy?

"in the fourth quarter were recovered 2 billion VAT evasa171, who intends to recover
Prodi in 2007 by all means put in place, which means that the only can realize the full VAT recovery goal (8 billion € per year). "

How strange, the great reformist government has however taken care to make, along with his partner Padoa Schioppa, an immediate financial mind-boggling to additional workers and employees are not content with proposing a reform (?) pensions that realizes the Maroni simply diluting the outputs in time from work (the stairs) with a continuous run (and never get there) until the fateful threshold of 60 years. Germany, home of the welfare state as a powerful union, IG Metall, has reformed pensions adapting to what is happening in the various OECD countries

"Epper if the money they reap from the tax authorities were to be paid as they should become a basic income that could pays for the work of civil commitment and therefore would be created through other means of consumption, perhaps the most lifeline consumption that sports cars, but it would be this bad? " Here

Antonio Carlo falls within the logic of planning much criticized in the old 70's Marple, and how their dreams of planning from the bottom

"It 's also clear that for Confindustria is impossible to ignore an explosive issue and gangrenous, a problem that in the coming years will become a strategic junction of the various conflicts, which will be engaged movement, trade unions, political parties and the government (to cope with the fiscal crisis) and the employers, whether large and small. It appears, therefore, a wide front in the fight where the attack tax evasion can find consensus and "banks" as never before. "

And here we reach the summit, may believe Antonio Carlo che la Confindustria ed il Governo non aspettassero altro che i suoi avvertimenti sulla minaccia determinata dall’evasione fiscale? Certo che un fronte comune tra Governo Sindacati e Confindustria (che bella ammucchiata) sarà certo in grado di invertire una tendenza nella quale loro stessi sono stati inevitabilmente coinvolti. Cosa crede Antonio Carlo: perché Sindacati e Confindustria stanno litigando sul TFR? Ma per accaparrarsi un finanziamento gratuito da investire in campo speculativo . E il Governo? Sta a guardare tanto in un modo o nell’altro entreranno più soldi dalla dinamica speculativa e maggiori saranno le possibilità per poter mantenere in vita la macchina governativa indipendentemente dal colore che ha.
E conclude

"Oggi in una situazione che presenta profili simili non mi meraviglierei se riemergessero prassi ed obbiettivi di un lontano passato.(l’autoriduzione delle bollette e la lotta per il salario degli anni 70) Come si vede le ipotesi e le prospettive di lotta non mancano, se il sistema sta impazzendo non dobbiamo subire passivamente la sua follia."

Invece le ipotesi e le prospettive mancano del tutto ed è impossibile per chiunque fare delle proposte immediate. La ripresa della lotta per il salario non la decidiamo noi od il buon Antonio Carlo ma i lavoratori che purtroppo vivono una condizione di piena concorrenza tra loro, la disoccupazione e la sottooccupazione non fanno altro che indebolire ormai una massa di lavoratori che si fa ricattare ogni giorno. Dovremmo far capire in qualche modo ai lavoratori che ormai costituiscono la stragrande maggioranza della società e che senza il loro consenso questo sistema cadrebbe in un batter d’occhio”. Ma come si può realizzare una cosa del genere quando coloro che dovrebbero avere a cuore il futuro dei lavoratori sono i primi a non averne fiducia? Ma è inutile quando un marxista cerca di fare proposte “risolutive” si scopre ed emerge sempre il solito keynesiano.
ante

Lose Inches Preparation H

from the mailing list of school policy

"Segreto di Stato: a Genova ci fu un disegno repressivo, prima condanna per la Polizia del G8 del 2001

La censura da parte dei media è stata rigida ed assoluta: della sentenza di Genova non si doveva parlare. Infatti incredibilmente non ne ha scritto neanche il Manifesto e dovrebbe spiegare perché.

di Gennaro Carotenuto < http://www.gennaroc arotenuto. it/ >

Alzi la mano chi ha saputo che la settimana scorsa a Genova c'è stata la prima condanna per i pestaggi della Polizia durante il G8 del 2001. Eppure la sentenza di Genova è un passaggio capitale per la ricostruzione della verità e la giustizia di quello che successe nel
capoluogo ligure oramai 6 anni fa. E ci spiega anche molto del disegno politico sotteso alla repressione.
Lo Stato è stato condannato a risarcire Marina Spaccini, 50 anni, pediatra triestina, volontaria per quattro anni in Africa, that the beatings suffered by the Police via Assarotti on the afternoon of July 20, 2001. Marina, like tens of thousands of militant Catholics of Rete Lilliput, was sitting with his hands up, painted white, shouting 'nonviolence' when he was murdered by the police. This they argued (sic) that was not possible to distinguish between hands painted white to Marina and Black Block. For Judge Angela Latella instead savage repression of Genoa and raised the curtain of lies to cover them-was one of the blackest pages in the entire history of the State Police and for the first time what is written in a sentence. Not only is much more severe sentence that is written in Genoa. Those of the police actions were neither isolated nor excessive, but were part of a criminal design. It begins as a case to confirm what the writer says, and writes for six years. In Genoa, there was a criminal design selective by the state apparatus. This design was intended to terrorize the radical left but not so much a Catholic pacifism, in particular the Rete Lilliput, which for the first time in a manner so convinced and went down to the large square welded into one huge antineoliberale face with his left. The girls and boys of the parishes were those who paid the highest price, especially Saturday. Their lengths were systematically targeted by the procession of tear gas and hundreds of them were savagely beaten. But, above all, tens of thousands of them, and their families, were scared to death in a fully logical terrorism. How many remained after Genoa at home?
the face image data from large earth deaf, Bush, Blair, Berlusconi, that peaceful movement, colorful, believable, made up of serious people and do not shut up of the sharks in the Forbidden City, which had gathered around concrete proposals for a new possible world of the Genoa Social Forum, was to be crushed. We did not know, but there were 50 days to 11 September.

reported on the site (listed below) < http://www.gennaroc arotenuto. en / >
excellent article Massimo Calandri, apparso SOLO sulle pagine genovesi di Repubblica lo scorso 29 aprile. E' normale secondo voi? Esiste ancora il diritto ad essere informati in questo paese? Prima condanna per le violenze delle forze dell'ordine contro i manifestanti: "Non furono iniziative isolate" G8, condannato il Ministero - Missionaria picchiata, risarciti invalidità e danni morali "Ho solo ottenuto quello che attendevo da 6 anni: giustizia"

MASSIMO CALANDRI
LA PRIMA condanna nei confronti del Ministero dell'Interno per le illecite e gratuite violenze dei suoi poliziotti è arrivata nei giorni scorsi, e cioè circa sei anni dopo la vergogna del G8 genovese. Ma le parole con cui il giudice istruttore Angela Latella ha motivato la sua decisione rinfrescano la memoria. Ricordando a tutti che quelle cariche sanguinarie, quelle teste rotte a manganellate, quei lacrimogeni sparati contro le persone inermi, non erano frutto dell'iniziativa isolata o dell'autonomo eccesso di qualche agente. Facevano invece parte di un più ampio disegno -così
come le menzogne raccontate più tardi per coprire le nefandezze - , che rappresenta una delle pagine più buie nella storia della Polizia di Stato. Il tribunale del capoluogo ligure ha dato ragione a Marina Spaccini, pediatra cinquantenne di origine triestina, pacifista che per quattro anni ha lavorato in due ospedali missionari del Kenia. Alle due del pomeriggio del 20 luglio, era il 2001, venne pestata a sangue in via Assarotti. Partecipava alla manifestation of Lilliput Network, was among those who lifted up his hands painted white screaming: "No violence!". The agents and their leaders would eventually told that they were chasing a group of Black Bloc, which was a mess and someone threw the Molotov cocktails at them, which was not possible to distinguish between "good" and "bad": lies unmasked during the process, as outlined by the judge. The bad guys were for real, and were beaten to the police who opened a large wound on the forehead of the pediatrician in Trieste. Since those agents, as in most of the incidents of the summit, have not been identified, Angela Latella decided to order the Interior Ministry. The figure Marina Spaccini to be paid is not sensational - five thousand euro between disability, moral and existential damage - but the point is obviously another. "If it is clear that the Spaccini was subjected to an act of violence by a member of the police - says the judge - no one can even call into question that there was no question of either acting alone, to some self
excess by some agent or a fatal incident during a legitimate police operation time and restore law and order seriously jeopardized. " Because the police action was not "legitimate", it is now clear enough. This was confirmed by witnesses e in un certo senso gli stessi poliziotti e funzionari, con le loro contraddizioni: «Gli aggressori erano diverse decine; l'ordine era di caricarli, disperderli ed arrestarli», hanno detto, interrogati. Ma poi risulta che furono arrestati solo due ragazzi (non feriti), la cui posizione fu in seguito peraltro archiviata. La pacifista era assistita dagli avvocati Alessandra Ballerini e Marco Vano. Il giudice ha sottolineato come fotografie e filmati portati in aula «siano stati illuminanti»: «Si vedono ammanettare persone vestite normalmente; più poliziotti colpire con i manganelli una persona a terra, inerme. La stessa Spaccini è una persona di cinquant'anni, di cui giustamente si sottolinea l'aspetto mite». E poi, le testimonies like that of a septuagenarian lady who speaks of a "completely peaceful and happy event" and therefore have seen agents' savagely beat people with his hands up and helpless as you. " Marina Spaccini upheld the court with a smile: "It was just what I was waiting for six years. Justice '. "